Your Complete Guide to the PBA Schedule and Upcoming Events

As a longtime enthusiast of marine exploration games, I've spent countless hours diving into virtual oceans, and I have to say the scanning mechanics in some of these titles really test your patience. Let me walk you through what I've discovered about how these systems work - and why they often feel more frustrating than they should. The scanning requirements are so excessive that small inconveniences end up feeling much more impactful than they realistically should be. I've lost track of how many times I've accidentally picked up a fish I'd already scanned while trying to register a new species. It's these little friction points that accumulate throughout a gaming session and really start to wear on you.

Every single time you scan any fish, the game forces this zoom-in animation that completely breaks your flow. You're there, immersed in this beautiful underwater world, and suddenly you're hitting the B button repeatedly to back out of the detailed view. I've timed this - that animation and recovery process takes about 3-4 seconds each time. When you're scanning dozens of fish in a session, those seconds really add up. I calculated that in my last two-hour playthrough, I spent approximately 12 minutes just watching that zoom animation and backing out of it. That's 10% of my gaming time wasted on a single repetitive action!

The grouping system for multiple species scans is particularly interesting because it's clearly meant to be a convenience feature, but in practice it creates more work. When you scan several different fish types simultaneously, they get grouped together in this listing interface. The problem - and this is a significant design flaw in my opinion - is that newly discovered species aren't prioritized in the list. You have to manually scroll down to find any entries with the "???" designation to officially mark them as discovered. I can't tell you how many times I've missed new species because they were buried in a list of 15-20 already-identified fish. Just last week, I scanned what I thought was a complete set of reef dwellers, only to realize later that I'd missed two new species because they were positioned at the very bottom of a 22-item list.

What's even more frustrating is when you encounter a large school of identical fish. Instead of grouping them logically, the system lists each one separately. I once scanned a school of 47 blue tangs and had to scroll through 47 individual entries in my log. That's just poor user experience design, plain and simple. A better approach would be to group identical species with a counter, but apparently that's too much to ask from current game developers.

The mapping system in Solo Dives presents its own set of challenges. The map charts slowly in segments as you explore, which sounds great in theory, but in practice it creates this constant tension between exploration and completionism. I found myself so focused on making sure I was filling in all the little squares on the map that I'd frequently miss fish swimming by or overlook depth changes that might have led to new discoveries. There's this psychological pressure to "complete" each grid section that actually works against the game's core exploration premise. I've probably missed about 30% of potential discoveries because I was too busy staring at the map instead of watching the environment around me.

What's particularly telling is how these systems interact to create compounding frustrations. The scanning interruptions make you miss environmental cues, the poor list management causes you to overlook new species, and the mapping distraction ensures you'll miss both fish and depth changes. It creates this perfect storm of inconvenience that ultimately detracts from what should be a relaxing, immersive experience. I've noticed my play sessions getting shorter not because I'm bored with the game, but because these friction points make the experience feel more like work than recreation.

From my experience across multiple marine exploration titles, the games that get this right are the ones that minimize interruptions and prioritize player convenience. The current system feels like it was designed by someone who never actually had to use it for extended periods. Simple fixes like prioritizing new discoveries, grouping identical species, and making the mapping system less intrusive would dramatically improve the experience. I'd even be willing to sacrifice some graphical fidelity for better quality-of-life features.

The irony isn't lost on me that in trying to create a comprehensive scanning and mapping system, developers have made the actual process of discovery more difficult. Instead of feeling like an intrepid explorer documenting new species, I often feel like a data entry clerk fighting with poorly designed software. And that's a shame, because beneath all these frustrating mechanics lies a genuinely captivating underwater world waiting to be explored. I just wish the tools for exploration were as refined as the environment they're meant to document.